On December 7, 2023, a team of Proskauer attorneys joined the American Civil Liberties Union (“ACLU”), the ACLU of Delaware, and attorneys from Shaw Keller LLP in filing a complaint against the state of Delaware on behalf of the Prisoners Legal Advocacy Network (“PLAN”) to protect the Constitutional right to vote for incarcerated individuals.

Background

Under the Delaware Constitution, incarcerated individuals retain their voting rights unless they have been convicted of a felony and have not had their rights restored. Eligible voters include individuals detained before trial, as well as those imprisoned following a misdemeanor conviction. Since incarceration prevents these eligible voters from voting in-person, their voting options had been limited exclusively to casting mail-in absentee ballots. Yet, absentee voting is currently unlawful for incarcerated individuals, as incarceration is not one of the specifically enumerated categories of absentee voting under the Delaware Constitution.

This issue came into focus last year when the Delaware Supreme Court issued its written opinion in Albence v. Higgin (“Higgin”), striking down a 2022 state statute authorizing all voters to vote by mail. In its ruling, the Delaware Supreme Court determined that the Legislature unconstitutionally expanded the categories of voters eligible to vote absentee under the Delaware Constitution. Since incarcerated persons were not among those enumerated, the ACLU pressed the State to provide assurances that eligible incarcerated voters would be able to vote in a constitutionally permitted manner in 2024—i.e., in person, given the Delaware Supreme Court’s decision in Higgin—and free from worry that the vote might be invalidated.

To date, Delaware has repeatedly refused to allow in-person voting machines—or present any other in-person voting option—within state prisons to ensure that these voters can constitutionally exercise their rights.

Prisoners Legal Advocacy Network

PLAN is a non-profit organization that provides legal services and support, including information about how to vote, to incarcerated individuals throughout the country. Delaware’s ongoing position on this issue post-Higgin has injured, and continues to injure, PLAN, its members and those on whose behalf PLAN serves.

The Lawsuit

The lawsuit brings claims against the State under the First and Fourteenth Amendments and their protections of the fundamental right to vote, as well as under the Fourteenth Amendment’s Equal Protection Clause on the basis of unconstitutional wealth discrimination between voters. (Delaware’s cash bail system means those who can post bail remain free to vote, but those who cannot afford bail and must remain imprisoned cannot vote. This system disproportionately impacts minorities.) 

Among other forms of relief, the lawsuit seeks to enjoin the State from disenfranchising eligible incarcerated voters and require that the State provide these eligible voters with a Constitutional, in-person means of accessing the ballot.

The Proskauer team includes partners Stephen Hibbard and Michael Lebowich; associates Godfre Blackman, Aaron Francis, Dixie Morrison, and Seth Victor; paralegal specialist Bobbi Preyer; and legal project assistant Adam Tolson.

Print:
Email this postTweet this postLike this postShare this post on LinkedIn
Photo of Stephen Hibbard Stephen Hibbard

Stephen Hibbard is a partner in the Litigation Department and a member of the Securities Litigation, Asset Management Litigation, and White Collar & Investigations groups.

A highly regarded complex commercial and securities litigator with more than 30 years of experience, Steve represents financial…

Stephen Hibbard is a partner in the Litigation Department and a member of the Securities Litigation, Asset Management Litigation, and White Collar & Investigations groups.

A highly regarded complex commercial and securities litigator with more than 30 years of experience, Steve represents financial institutions, companies, and individuals in commercial litigation, securities class actions, merger & acquisition litigation, derivative actions, and corporate governance disputes. He routinely represents clients in regulatory or internal investigations, and regularly advises public companies on fiduciary duty and disclosure issues.

Steve has led the defense of dozens of headline-making and high-profile matters from cryptocurrency to cyber-security, from fintech to greentech, and from the housing mortgage crisis to the age of digital assets and AI. Buyers, sellers, and financial advisors have relied on him in merger litigation, including in dozens of technology company mergers.

Steve has also handled complex litigation matters involving corporate finance, accounting, antitrust, defamation, copyright, tax, employment, RICO, and unfair business practices claims for businesses in a wide range of industries including investment banking, commercial banking, venture capital, private equity, asset management, biotech, pharmaceuticals, hardware, semiconductors, software, and sports leagues and teams.

Photo of Aaron Francis Aaron Francis

Aaron Francis is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Litigation Group.

Aaron’s practice focuses on complex civil litigations, internal and regulatory investigations, and arbitrations, covering a range of types of disputes, including cybersecurity, commercial…

Aaron Francis is an associate in the Litigation Department and a member of the Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Litigation Group.

Aaron’s practice focuses on complex civil litigations, internal and regulatory investigations, and arbitrations, covering a range of types of disputes, including cybersecurity, commercial contracts, and securities.  He also advises, counsels, and represents various pro bono clients, including non-profit organizations on issues related to harassment and discrimination, incarcerated survivors of domestic violence in criminal appeals, and multiple other entities in civil rights litigation.

Aaron is a member of Proskauer’s Black Lawyers Affinity Group.

Photo of Dixie Morrison Dixie Morrison

Dixie Morrison is an associate in the Labor & Employment Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration Group. She is a member of the Discrimination, Harassment, & Title VII and the Labor-Management Relations practice groups.

Dixie assists clients across a…

Dixie Morrison is an associate in the Labor & Employment Department and a member of the Employment Litigation & Arbitration Group. She is a member of the Discrimination, Harassment, & Title VII and the Labor-Management Relations practice groups.

Dixie assists clients across a variety of industries in litigation and arbitration relating to wrongful termination, discrimination, harassment, retaliation, wage and hour, trade secrets, breach of contract, and whistleblower matters in both the single-plaintiff and class and collective action contexts. She also maintains an active traditional labor and collective bargaining practice and regularly counsels employers on a diverse range of workplace issues.

Dixie earned her J.D. from Harvard Law School, where she was the Executive Editor of Submissions for the Journal of Sports and Entertainment Law. Dixie received her B.A., magna cum laude, from Pomona College. Prior to law school, she served as a labor and economic policy aide in the United States Senate.